Search for: "Cricket Wireless, LLC" Results 1 - 7 of 7
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Postpichal v. Cricket Wireless, LLC: Under RICO, Differences in Consumers’ Experience Purchasing 4G Cell Phones and Plans Does Not Defeat Predominance
13 Aug 2021, 1:08 pm by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
Cricket Wireless, LLC, No. [read post]
Impact Litigation Journal - http://www.impactlitigation.com/
When does "no contract" mean "mandatory arbitration contract"?
4 Nov 2015, 4:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Cricket Wireless LLC, 2015 WL 6689396, No. [read post]
43(B)log - http://tushnet.blogspot.com/
Don’t Jump the Gun: The Northern District of California Compels the Production of Litigation Hold Letters, Holding Duty to Preserve Not Terminated When Related Lawsuits Were Resolved
13 May 2021, 8:33 am by Jessica A. Huse
Cricket Wireless, LLC (“Barraza”) before Judge Alsup. [read post]
IP Law Alert - http://www.iplawalert.com
Don’t Jump the Gun: The Northern District of California Compels the Production of Litigation Hold Letters, Holding Duty to Preserve Not Terminated When Related Lawsuits Were Resolved
13 May 2021, 8:33 am by Jessica A. Huse
Cricket Wireless, LLC (“Barraza”) before Judge Alsup. [read post]
Real Property & Environmental Law Alert - http://www.rpelawalert.com/
Don’t Jump the Gun: The Northern District of California Compels the Production of Litigation Hold Letters, Holding Duty to Preserve Not Terminated When Related Lawsuits Were Resolved
13 May 2021, 8:33 am by Jessica A. Huse
Cricket Wireless, LLC (“Barraza”) before Judge Alsup. [read post]
Employment Law Alert - http://www.employmentlawalert.com
More iPhone intel*
13 Jan 2007, 9:03 am
The IPKat's friend and keen cricket fan David King of Australian law firm EKM Legal has been doing a bit of digging on iPhone trade marks (see previous blog here). [read post]
IPKat - http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/
Northern District of California Decertifies Class Under Comcast Due to Inadequacy of Damages Model
28 Sep 2022, 10:23 am by Charles W. Niemann and Jonathan W. Garlough
Cricket Wireless, LLC, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California recently decertified a class because of a “critical” mistake in Plaintiff’s damages model that rendered it inadequate under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Comcast v. [read post]
Consumer Class Defense Counsel - https://www.foley.com/en/insights/blogs/consumer-class-defense-counsel